Boomer, I wanted to inform you that despite your continuous warnings, two users namely Monk and Gunshow have added false information on the page, accusing you of hoaxing Goatman (even more explicitly stated in the image caption) and trying to antagonize the author, I believe that it should be known to you since the information posted by them has no basis. I won't roll it back since Gunshow has admin rights to engage in an edit war.
1.) What does Monk have to do with any of this? He literally just added details regarding the pedestrian path in the game's code and that's it...
2.) "this wiki is to host all the facts given" - it's a fact that all three Goatman sightings (that were on the page before I edited it) are false, either by hoaxes or misunderstandings. Surely if the wiki exists to reflect facts, then it would be updated to the most factual information?
And if you really want to change the article in any way, your first step is to edit the article leaving a succint edit summary explaining why, and not to immediately run to a bureaucrat and start demanding that the user you're in a dispute with should be banned. This is common sense on every other wikisite ever, but I guess GMW is different.
Justifying why data lies against the myth isn't accusing anyone of hoaxing it. There are hundreds of articles on here that have evidence to suggest they are fake, but the myth status still remains unknown. Stop with the bullshit.
Gunshow I'm sure that you're aware that pages on this wiki are to be presented in a factual based, impartial narrative. The additions you made to the Goatman page do not represent how any other page is formatted on this wiki, most notably by the use of uncertified, uncredible "evidence", and by indirectly accusing me of hoaxing. Do not make biased additions to articles from here on out (kind of unbelievable how I have to remind an admin this).