I saw this in a YouTube video. According to the theory, CJ and Franklin are related by blood. CJ is either his uncle, with Denise being his aunt. This should be considered because in the GTA V trailer she looks like Denise Robinson from GTA SA. CJ and Franklin look alike in a few ways. They both have muscles in their default look. Dress Franklin up in a white tank and blue jeans in his default hair cut and tell me he don't look like CJ.
Trying to talk logic in relation to GTA myths is madness at its most futile. Most so-called "myth hunters" just outright make sh*t up that isn't supported anywhere in the game.
I think there is no need to be racist but why did rockstar make these characters black (sorry again)Why didn’t you make one off them white and make us guess if there related also they look a like aswell.
Excluding the fact they're real life cousins it's possible they're related even if CJ wasn't directly involved with him. IE a child of a prostitute or a one night stand CJ had.
Yes yes we could argue about the different continuities but the fact they're Easter eggs, achievements, and the fact Grove street still exists. Makes you question whether or not they will bring it all back together in VI. Which will likely take place on the eastern side of the country. Whether that's Vice City or Liberty City or something completely new we'll find out. Chicago would be an interesting setting for example if it's new.
I think more people would buy the continuity difference if Grove Street or Ballas didn't exist or were a different named African American gang, I guess the only big difference is how San Andreas/Southern San Andreas is different then 3d Universe. But obviously there would be no way for those games to compete with current gaming in terms of resources and what you could do back then till now.
I think this video explains the Ballas well and makes since given the changes we see, and a partial history to the Ballas we see in V https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCSqJLI2Now
Either way I still enjoy the Classic GTA III, Vice City, and San Andreas after the debacle of the GTA Trilogy Definitive Edition.
IV to me was a good step in the right direction as you do need to evolve the game over an expansive franchise including those older 2d versions. V was also great I like how you can play as multiple characters which really gives you variety.
Also personally could give a damn on the race of a main character you play. As long as the story is decent and evolves that's all that matters. Perhaps VI could cap the end of the HD Universe as a Trilogy but it would need to connect IV, V, and obviously VI if they go that route.
Look I play San Andreas a lot of times and I've heard Denise say she had three children she gave them away idk if they would have children together since Denise doesn't seem like wanted children at all since she give away her 3 I don't know if the father has the children or if she give up for adoption ya he does look like cj alot I even have San Andreas on my Xbox still I play it but I think Rockstar should have told more about the stories behind each character better I can understand she don't trust men but her being mad cj he was betrayed by his own gang he almost loss last bother too cj loss a lot from being n gang again he. Was tried being attack and for Denise to be upset with him because he didn't want to be in the gang anymore it is kind of selfish cj just want live better live for him self n he didn't want lose anymore ppl he love care about so choose peace n happiness I sure what mother would of wanted
