You know, this seems a bit sketchy. I think you're just protecting Boomer even more. Whenever someone goes against him, you create some new rule on the spot. For example, you've set a stupidly high requirement to vote (100 edits and 1 month,) just so new users, an important part of the community, can't disagree with you. And now, a new policy that won't even let us make a certain type of request? And how could I forget my policy preposition, where I said that obviously fake posts (i.e Swamp Monster) shouldn't become articles, and yet you shoot it down for being too 'bureaucratic' even though most of the wiki supported it.
It'd be better if you added a policy that actually kept the wiki clean rather than one that justs gives your friend diplomatic immunity.