1,481
pages
ALL POSTS
0
<p>Wow.
First, comparing this header with the content already confuses me. In the header, it is obviously told that your desire is to reform alternative version of this wiki because you think this wiki is bullshit. In the content of this thread, you even tried to say how this wiki creates shit content and how you basically want to promote your wiki while you absorb editors of this wiki to your wiki. </p><p>You also write a useless FAQ and completely ignore what you just wrote above, trying to cover your real wish to just destroy this wiki as a whole. It is complete bullshit, hopefully, bureaucrats will see this and will not let it slide. I'm no way highlighting your bullshit plan. </p>
First, comparing this header with the content already confuses me. In the header, it is obviously told that your desire is to reform alternative version of this wiki because you think this wiki is bullshit. In the content of this thread, you even tried to say how this wiki creates shit content and how you basically want to promote your wiki while you absorb editors of this wiki to your wiki. </p><p>You also write a useless FAQ and completely ignore what you just wrote above, trying to cover your real wish to just destroy this wiki as a whole. It is complete bullshit, hopefully, bureaucrats will see this and will not let it slide. I'm no way highlighting your bullshit plan. </p>
(Edited by Mantiix)
Provided above is a demonstration of exactly why this idea was hatched in the first place.
(Edited by Gunshow20)
<div class="quote"><i>Mantiix wrote:
Wow.
<p>First, comparing this header with the content already confuses me. In the header, it is obviously told that your desire is to reform alternative version of this wiki because you think this wiki is bullshit. In the content of this thread, you even tried to say how this wiki creates shit content and how you basically want to promote your wiki while you absorb editors of this wiki to your wiki. </p><p>You also write a useless FAQ and completely ignore what you just wrote above, trying to cover your real wish to just destroy this wiki as a whole. It is complete bullshit, hopefully, bureaucrats will see this and will not let it slide. I'm no way highlighting your bullshit plan. </p> </i></div>
<p>Except there is no activity to talk about in the first place, all the "active" users are leaving for one reason or the other, and don't even try to tell me that this wikia is without bullshit content. I mean, hell, we even have articles about completely false myths, born from videos published by clickbait YouTubers (Although, I admit, some of them, like Brad Snider's Ghost were created to taunt them) </p><p>I know because I created the page. </p>
Wow.
<p>First, comparing this header with the content already confuses me. In the header, it is obviously told that your desire is to reform alternative version of this wiki because you think this wiki is bullshit. In the content of this thread, you even tried to say how this wiki creates shit content and how you basically want to promote your wiki while you absorb editors of this wiki to your wiki. </p><p>You also write a useless FAQ and completely ignore what you just wrote above, trying to cover your real wish to just destroy this wiki as a whole. It is complete bullshit, hopefully, bureaucrats will see this and will not let it slide. I'm no way highlighting your bullshit plan. </p> </i></div>
<p>Except there is no activity to talk about in the first place, all the "active" users are leaving for one reason or the other, and don't even try to tell me that this wikia is without bullshit content. I mean, hell, we even have articles about completely false myths, born from videos published by clickbait YouTubers (Although, I admit, some of them, like Brad Snider's Ghost were created to taunt them) </p><p>I know because I created the page. </p>
(Edited by Shred N Slash)
0
<p>There is activity on GTA MW, and the activity can rise because school or college is going to an end to some users. You call my good written article as bullshit, but you don't manage to read it properly. Creating alternative wiki after some minor bad happenings in this wiki says nothing but intensive hate and desire to ruin this wiki, there is no doubt, at all.
</p>
(Edited by Mantiix)
<div class="quote"><i>Mantiix wrote:
There is activity on GTA MW, and the activity can rise because school or college is going to an end to some users. You call my good written article as bullshit, but you don't manage to read it properly. Creating alternative wiki after some minor bad happenings in this wiki says nothing but intensive hate and desire to ruin this wiki, there is no doubt, at all.</i></div>
<p>1. Like I said, all of the active users right now are quitting, for one reason or the other. The only new activity you'll get is from summerfags like in 2017, where users came, made 4 edits and left forever. </p><p>2. Yeah, it's pretty good when Gunshow fixed it up. This myth is literally impossible by game files. This is not GTA V where you can hide behind "the files may not be fully searched through yet" (they are tho), this is San Andreas, a game that was released in 2004. All the damn files have been searched through and to check if a car can spawn in a certain location you need to things. 1) a copy of GTA SA 2) MS Notepad. So unless you're telling me that the game defied it's own code, which is impossible, your "myth" is just as impossible. </p><p>3. I mean, yeah, no doubt for you, but then again you accused Filip of being Fen because they are both from Croatia and their birthday has the number 3 in it, you accused me of creating a sockpuppet to troll the chat with your evidence being.... I disagreed with you when you were removed from a facebook chat group for spamming cancerous memes. </p>
There is activity on GTA MW, and the activity can rise because school or college is going to an end to some users. You call my good written article as bullshit, but you don't manage to read it properly. Creating alternative wiki after some minor bad happenings in this wiki says nothing but intensive hate and desire to ruin this wiki, there is no doubt, at all.</i></div>
<p>1. Like I said, all of the active users right now are quitting, for one reason or the other. The only new activity you'll get is from summerfags like in 2017, where users came, made 4 edits and left forever. </p><p>2. Yeah, it's pretty good when Gunshow fixed it up. This myth is literally impossible by game files. This is not GTA V where you can hide behind "the files may not be fully searched through yet" (they are tho), this is San Andreas, a game that was released in 2004. All the damn files have been searched through and to check if a car can spawn in a certain location you need to things. 1) a copy of GTA SA 2) MS Notepad. So unless you're telling me that the game defied it's own code, which is impossible, your "myth" is just as impossible. </p><p>3. I mean, yeah, no doubt for you, but then again you accused Filip of being Fen because they are both from Croatia and their birthday has the number 3 in it, you accused me of creating a sockpuppet to troll the chat with your evidence being.... I disagreed with you when you were removed from a facebook chat group for spamming cancerous memes. </p>
(Edited by Shred N Slash)
0
<p>The deeper the argument gets, the more incorrect your reasonings are becoming. First, this wiki is still active, I don't think users will leave this wiki with so many articles just to edit on a wiki that will be a leftover in 2 weeks anyways. It will be surprising if the new wiki will be active more than 2 weeks. And no, Gunshow did not fix it up, lmao. Gunshow literally edited NOTHING. That just explains your praise for Gunshow.
When the same quality is written by me - it's bad
When the same quality is written by Gunshow - incredible work
</p>
(Edited by Mantiix)
<div class="quote"><i>Mantiix wrote:
The deeper the argument gets, the more incorrect your reasonings are becoming. First, this wiki is still active, I don't think users will leave this wiki with so many articles just to edit on a wiki that will be a leftover in 2 weeks anyways. It will be surprising if the new wiki will be active more than 2 weeks. And no, Gunshow did not fix it up, lmao. Gunshow literally edited NOTHING. That just explains your praise for Gunshow. <p>When the same quality is written by me - it's bad When the same quality is written by Gunshow - incredible work </p> </i></div>
<p>I like how you managed to derail this thread and completely make it about your own page and leave only 1-2 sentences about the actual message of the thread. </p><p>1. Don't match your opinion = incorrect? Ok.. </p><p>2. Yes, the wikia is still active, the activity is made up of users who all said that they're either gonna leave soon or that they're already done. Can you name more than 1 user who just joined the wikia and made ACTUAL EDITS? I can name only one; Filip. The rest have been here since 2015-16 or their edits are comments on irrelivant pages. </p><p>3. If you don't think that'll happen then you obviously weren't paying any attention during Summer '17. Most users were like the ones I mentioned in point 2; they left comments on irrelivant pages and moved on. </p><p>4. Yeah, essiantially no hoaxes and no impossible glitches, only facts. It'll be active for like a month before it reaches the maximum of 100 pages. </p><p>5. "Gunshow literally edited NOTHING" huh? </p><p>6. Haha, the same quality as Gunshow written by you? Mant's original draft of the page vs. Gunshow's overhaul, I'll let you decide who has the superior edit quality :) </p>
The deeper the argument gets, the more incorrect your reasonings are becoming. First, this wiki is still active, I don't think users will leave this wiki with so many articles just to edit on a wiki that will be a leftover in 2 weeks anyways. It will be surprising if the new wiki will be active more than 2 weeks. And no, Gunshow did not fix it up, lmao. Gunshow literally edited NOTHING. That just explains your praise for Gunshow. <p>When the same quality is written by me - it's bad When the same quality is written by Gunshow - incredible work </p> </i></div>
<p>I like how you managed to derail this thread and completely make it about your own page and leave only 1-2 sentences about the actual message of the thread. </p><p>1. Don't match your opinion = incorrect? Ok.. </p><p>2. Yes, the wikia is still active, the activity is made up of users who all said that they're either gonna leave soon or that they're already done. Can you name more than 1 user who just joined the wikia and made ACTUAL EDITS? I can name only one; Filip. The rest have been here since 2015-16 or their edits are comments on irrelivant pages. </p><p>3. If you don't think that'll happen then you obviously weren't paying any attention during Summer '17. Most users were like the ones I mentioned in point 2; they left comments on irrelivant pages and moved on. </p><p>4. Yeah, essiantially no hoaxes and no impossible glitches, only facts. It'll be active for like a month before it reaches the maximum of 100 pages. </p><p>5. "Gunshow literally edited NOTHING" huh? </p><p>6. Haha, the same quality as Gunshow written by you? Mant's original draft of the page vs. Gunshow's overhaul, I'll let you decide who has the superior edit quality :) </p>
(Edited by Shred N Slash)
0
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Altair the Rattlhead wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Mantiix wrote:
The deeper the argument gets, the more incorrect your reasonings are becoming. First, this wiki is still active, I don't think users will leave this wiki with so many articles just to edit on a wiki that will be a leftover in 2 weeks anyways. It will be surprising if the new wiki will be active more than 2 weeks. And no, Gunshow did not fix it up, lmao. Gunshow literally edited NOTHING. That just explains your praise for Gunshow. <p>When the same quality is written by me - it's bad When the same quality is written by Gunshow - incredible work </p> </i></div>
<p>I like how you managed to derail this thread and completely make it about your own page and leave only 1-2 sentences about the actual message of the thread. </p><p>1. Don't match your opinion = incorrect? Ok.. </p><p>2. Yes, the wikia is still active, the activity is made up of users who all said that they're either gonna leave soon or that they're already done. Can you name more than 1 user who just joined the wikia and made ACTUAL EDITS? I can name only one; Filip. The rest have been here since 2015-16 or their edits are comments on irrelivant pages. </p><p>3. If you don't think that'll happen then you obviously weren't paying any attention during Summer '17. Most users were like the ones I mentioned in point 2; they left comments on irrelivant pages and moved on. </p><p>4. Yeah, essiantially no hoaxes and no impossible glitches, only facts. It'll be active for like a month before it reaches the maximum of 100 pages. </p><p>5. "Gunshow literally edited NOTHING" huh? </p><p>6. Haha, the same quality as Gunshow written by you? Mant's original draft of the page vs. Gunshow's overhaul, I'll let you decide who has the superior edit quality :) </p> </div> <p>1. Never even said that.
2. We have a future predictor. Nice work.
3. Literally same thing written twice.
4. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
5. Wow, Gun added a template, amazing, I couldn't do that. SMDH.
6. Comparing my old version with his new version? Fair enough lmao. </p>
The deeper the argument gets, the more incorrect your reasonings are becoming. First, this wiki is still active, I don't think users will leave this wiki with so many articles just to edit on a wiki that will be a leftover in 2 weeks anyways. It will be surprising if the new wiki will be active more than 2 weeks. And no, Gunshow did not fix it up, lmao. Gunshow literally edited NOTHING. That just explains your praise for Gunshow. <p>When the same quality is written by me - it's bad When the same quality is written by Gunshow - incredible work </p> </i></div>
<p>I like how you managed to derail this thread and completely make it about your own page and leave only 1-2 sentences about the actual message of the thread. </p><p>1. Don't match your opinion = incorrect? Ok.. </p><p>2. Yes, the wikia is still active, the activity is made up of users who all said that they're either gonna leave soon or that they're already done. Can you name more than 1 user who just joined the wikia and made ACTUAL EDITS? I can name only one; Filip. The rest have been here since 2015-16 or their edits are comments on irrelivant pages. </p><p>3. If you don't think that'll happen then you obviously weren't paying any attention during Summer '17. Most users were like the ones I mentioned in point 2; they left comments on irrelivant pages and moved on. </p><p>4. Yeah, essiantially no hoaxes and no impossible glitches, only facts. It'll be active for like a month before it reaches the maximum of 100 pages. </p><p>5. "Gunshow literally edited NOTHING" huh? </p><p>6. Haha, the same quality as Gunshow written by you? Mant's original draft of the page vs. Gunshow's overhaul, I'll let you decide who has the superior edit quality :) </p> </div> <p>1. Never even said that.
2. We have a future predictor. Nice work.
3. Literally same thing written twice.
4. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
5. Wow, Gun added a template, amazing, I couldn't do that. SMDH.
6. Comparing my old version with his new version? Fair enough lmao. </p>
(Edited by Mantiix)
<p>I have been convinced of one thing... it's a waste of time.
</p><p>Toxic behavior of GMW on full display. I guess it's not worth it if this is the userbase that's going to be attracted. Notwithstanding demanding I be banned for making an offshoot, or debating whether or not a false page can be labeled "bullshit" or not.
</p><p>Thank you Mant for ruining yet another thread.
</p>
(Edited by Gunshow20)